Given the enormity of The Dark Knight and the circumstances under which it was released, The Dark Knight Rises,
Nolan's third and final entry in the series, was certain to generate similar
buzz, despite also shouldering an enormous burden to meet unreasonable
expectations. The film represents the most sprawling installment of the series, as well as the most vunerable to criticism. While
critical and audience reactions have been mixed, I found it more emotionally
involving and less aesthetically jarring than The Dark
Knight. Yet, despite my enjoyment as I watched it, I
came away from the experience curiously having retained very little of its
frenzy of plot and action. The reasons for this are similar to those that
plagued the earlier entries. In short, the film is a muddle of images and
ideas. As such, however, The Dark
Knight Rises is more significant than the previous
films in Nolan's trilogy. I would even go as far as
to say that it is a defining statement regarding its director, not
necessarily due to the concerns and ideas he embeds into the film, but for what
it says about his concept of storytelling. I arrived at this somewhere over the
course of the film's nearly three-hour running time, during which many
character and story arcs converge and expand amid endless jawing about social
equality and revolution, before finally deflating and signifying nothing.
Click here to read the full article at Slant Magazine's blog The House Next Door.
No comments:
Post a Comment